MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042462744 · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030001

The New International Health Regulations and the Federalism Dilemma

2005· article· en· W2042462744 on OpenAlexafffund
Kumanan Wilson, Christopher W. McDougall, Ross Upshur

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS Medicine · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPublic Health Policies and Education
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreQueen's UniversitySunnybrook Health Science CentreThe Wilson CentreUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchDepartment of Medicine, University of TorontoDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of TorontoUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsDilemmaFederalismMedicinePublic healthGlobal healthPolitical scienceEnvironmental healthPoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Policy Forum allows health policy makers around the world to discuss challenges and opportunities for improving

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.031
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.048
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0310.048
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.021
Scholarly communication0.0120.012
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0240.026
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.472
Teacher spread0.389 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations93
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS MedicineSame topicPublic Health Policies and EducationFrench-language works237,207