MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Effect of Grain Orientation on Micro Frictional of Medium Carbon Steel

2005· article· en· W2042484376 on OpenAlexaff
M. Reza Bateni, M. Azzi, Jerzy A. Szpunar, X. Wang, Dong Yang Li

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials science forum · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical stress and fatigue analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceCrystalliteAnisotropyTexture (cosmology)Composite materialSubstrate (aquarium)Orientation (vector space)Friction coefficientCarbon steelGrain sizeNano-Atomic force microscopyMetallurgyCrystallographyNanotechnologyGeometryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mechanical processing of metals results often in development of preferred orientation of grains or texture. On the other hand, the orientations of grains have a significant effect on the friction and wear behaviour of materials in contact. The objective of this investigation was to determine the crystallographic anisotropy of the coefficient of friction. Medium carbon steel AISI 1045 were selected as the substrate material. Automated orientation imaging analysis system (OIM) was used to identify orientations of grains in polycrystalline specimens. Micro-friction tests were carried out using a Tribocope, a combination of nano-mechanical probe and atomic force microscope with an electrochemical cell. The micro friction tests were performed along different crystallographic directions inside different grains.The obtained results have shown that the coefficient of friction for individual grains depends on crystallographic orientation, and that the coefficient of friction for higher atomic density planes is lower than that for lower atomic density planes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials science forumSame topicMechanical stress and fatigue analysisFrench-language works237,207