MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cardiac surgery in patients with haemophilia B: a case report and review of the literature

2009· review· en· W2042511766 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth F. Krakow, Irwin Walker, André Lamy, Julia A. M. Anderson

Bibliographic record

VenueHaemophilia · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemophilia Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesRegional Municipality of NiagaraMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHaemophiliaCardiac surgeryvalvular heart diseaseDiseaseHaemophilia ASurgeryMultidisciplinary approachMultidisciplinary teamHaemophilia BAortic valve replacementIntensive care medicineGeneral surgeryPediatricsCardiologyInternal medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiac surgery for coronary heart disease, and for calcific and degenerative valvular heart disease, will likely become more frequent with an ageing haemophilia population. Our report describes the successful management of an individual with mild haemophilia B undergoing elective aortic valve replacement using a continuous infusion of recombinant factor IX. Emphasis is placed on the multidisciplinary coordination of care required across three hospital sites to ensure an uncomplicated peri- and postoperative course. We also provide a review of the current literature on cardiac surgery in patients with haemophilia B.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.674
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHaemophiliaSame topicHemophilia Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207