An Evidence of Stromal Cell Populations Functionally Linked with Epithelial Cell Populations in the Mouse Oviduct
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The oviductal epithelium consists of two major cell populations, secretory cells and cilial cells. In a previous report, we established clonal cell lines from the epithelium and stroma of an oviduct which allowed us to analyze stromal contribution to epithelial functions. Three stromal cell lines were co-cultured in separated apparatus with 3 epithelial cell lines, respectively. Two stromal cell lines preferentially stimulated mogp-1 expression on secretory cells and the stimulation was additive with estrogen. The lines had no effect on cilial cells. One stromal cell line preferentially stimulated foxj1 expression on cilial cells and the stimulation relieved suppression by estrogen. The line had no effect on secretory cells. Experiments with conditioned media of the stromal cells confirmed the results of co-culture experiments, suggesting that the oviductal stroma contains multiple cell populations preferentially regulating or modulating specific cell populations of the epithelium via diffusible factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".