MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042540896 · doi:10.1300/j018v30n01_02

Qualitative Research on Older Drivers

2006· article· en· W2042540896 on OpenAlex
Fauzia Gardezi, Keith G. Wilson, Malcolm Man‐Son‐Hing, Shawn Marshall, Frank Molnar, Bonnie Dobbs, Holly Tuokko

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Gerontologist · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOlder Adults Driving Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of OttawaÉlisabeth Bruyère Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQualitative researchFocus groupPsychologyGerontologyApplied psychologyHuman factors and ergonomicsOlder peoplePopulationSuicide preventionPoison controlMedicineSociologyMarketingMedical emergencyEnvironmental healthBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract With an aging population, concerns for road safety point to a growing need for research into the driving attitudes and habits of older adults. In this review of the qualitative literature, we have identified 25 studies that used focus groups or interviews to learn about the experiences and concerns of older drivers. The review addresses four themes: (1) The importance of driving; (2) negative aspects of driving; (3) the process of driving cessation, and; (4) views of transportation alternatives. An understanding of these topics can help to improve program and research planning for the transportation needs of older adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.488
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.681
GPT teacher head0.731
Teacher spread0.050 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it