MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042541333 · doi:10.1002/sia.3239

X‐ray spectromicroscopy study of ubiquitin adsorption to plasma polymerized microstructures

2010· article· en· W2042541333 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSurface and Interface Analysis · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIon-surface interactions and analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyMicrostructureAdsorptionPolymerizationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceProtein adsorptionScanning electron microscopeChemistryMass spectrometrySynchrotronCrystallographyChemical engineeringPolymerOpticsChromatographyOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Synchrotron‐based X‐ray photoemission electron microscopy (X‐PEEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), time of flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF‐SIMS) and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) have been used to visualize and characterize plasma polymerized acrylic acid (ppAA) and poly ethylene oxide (PEO)‐like microstructures. Micropatterned microstructures have been fabricated with electron‐beam lithography to obtain contrasted ppAA/PEO‐like structures. A surface area of 500 µm × 500 µm was patterned with arrays of 5 µm diameter circles and 500 µm × 5 µm lines. Samples have been analyzed before and after immersion of ubiquitin protein solutions. AFM and X‐PEEM results indicated that the protein adsorbed preferentially on the ppAA regions for both circular and line patterns. For both circular and line patterns, the protein preferentially adsorbed to the ppAA regions. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it