QUANTUM SIMULATIONS OF DUAL GATE MOSFET DEVICES: BUILDING AND DEPLOYING COMMUNITY NANOTECHNOLOGY SOFTWARE TOOLS ON NANOHUB.ORG
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Undesirable short-channel effects associated with the relentless downscaling of conventional CMOS devices have led to the emergence of new classes of MOSFETs. This has led to new and unprecedented challenges in computational nanoelectronics. The device sizes have already reached the level of tens of nanometers where quantum nature of charge-carriers dominates the device operation and performance. The goal of this paper is to describe an on-going initiative on nanoHUB.org to provide new models, algorithms, approaches, and a comprehensive suite of freely-available web-based simulation tools for nanoscale devices with capabilities not yet available commercially. Three software packages nanoFET, nanoMOS and QuaMC are benchmarked in the simulation of a widely-studied high-performance novel MOSFET device. The impact of quantum mechanical effects on the device properties is elucidated and key design issues are suggested.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it