MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

On Symbol Mapping for Binary Physical-Layer Network Coding with PSK Modulation

2011· article· en· W2042557094 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières
KeywordsComputer scienceGray codeBinary numberPhase-shift keyingPhysical layerAmbiguityAlgorithmConstellationLinear network codingRelayBit error rateDecoding methodsTheoretical computer scienceComputer networkTelecommunicationsMathematicsWirelessArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a system employing physical-layer network coding, the superimposed constellation at the relay may have ambiguity where one received signal is associated with more than one possible combination of users' data. We find the necessary and sufficient condition on a user bit mapping which removes this ambiguity for phase shift keying modulation. Further, we introduce the concept of semi-Gray mapping which improves the system BER performance and achievable rate. The necessary and sufficient condition of having a semi-Gray mapping is also found. Interestingly, the widely used binary reflected Gray mapping does not satisfy the semi-Gray mapping condition resulting in a poorer performance compared to our proposed semi-Gray scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it