MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization with peptide nucleic acid probes for enumeration of specific chromosomes in human cells

2000· article· en· W2042564325 on OpenAlexaff
Krishan Taneja, Elizabeth A. Chavez, James Coull, Peter M. Lansdorp

Bibliographic record

VenueGenes Chromosomes and Cancer · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeptide nucleic acidNucleic acidMetaphaseInterphaseMolecular biologyFluorescence in situ hybridizationBiologyDNAHybridization probeChromosomeNucleic acid thermodynamicsIn situ hybridizationFish <Actinopterygii>In situComputational biologyGeneticsChemistryGeneBase sequenceMessenger RNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In previous studies, we showed that peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probes have significant advantages over conventional synthetic RNA or DNA probes in FISH procedures for detecting telomeric and trinucleotide repeat sequences. Here, we report that directly labeled PNA probes recognizing chromosome-specific repeat sequences are also powerful tools for detecting and enumerating specific chromosomes in interphase and metaphase cells. This is illustrated by multicolor FISH experiments with cells from normal individuals and patients with numerical sex chromosome aberrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenes Chromosomes and CancerSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207