MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042568997 · doi:10.1155/2008/609425

One‐Dimensional Hurwitz Spaces, Modular Curves, and Real Forms of Belyi Meromorphic Functions

2008· article· en· W2042568997 on OpenAlexaff
Antonio F. Costa, Milagros Izquierdo, Gonzalo Riera

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsEngineering Link (Canada)
FundersFondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico
KeywordsAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hurwitz spaces are spaces of pairs ( S , f ) where S is a Riemann surface and a meromorphic function. In this work, we study 1‐dimensional Hurwitz spaces of meromorphic p ‐fold functions with four branched points, three of them fixed; the corresponding monodromy representation over each branched point is a product of ( p − 1)/2 transpositions and the monodromy group is the dihedral group D p . We prove that the completion of the Hurwitz space is uniformized by a non‐nomal index p + 1 subgroup of a triangular group with signature (0; [ p , p , p ]). We also establish the relation of the meromorphic covers with elliptic functions and show that is a quotient of the upper half plane by the modular group Γ (2)∩ Γ 0 ( p ). Finally, we study the real forms of the Belyi projection and show that there are two nonbicoformal equivalent such real forms which are topologically conjugated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical SciencesSame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207