MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042618430 · doi:10.2514/1.40954

Measurements of Fluctuating Pressures on a Circular Cylinder in Subsonic Cross Flow

2009· article· en· W2042618430 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan Ackerman, J. P. Gostelow, Aldo Rona, W. E. Carscallen

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsMechanicsCylinderFlow (mathematics)PhysicsAerospace engineeringGeometryMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A circular cylinder is tested in crossflow over the subsonic speed range. Time-resolved pressure distributions give information on surface pressure fluctuations; the corresponding drag and base drag coefficients are provided. Measured base pressure fluctuations at low Mach numbers are in agreement with the findings of other researchers. Flow changes at higher subsonic velocities and into the transonic range are described. Illustrations are drawn from the observations of other researchers, enabling physical explanations to be given to assist toward a more general modeling of the problem. At Mach numbers above 0.6 the changing strength of the vortices reduces the base drag coefficient up to a Mach number of 0.9, at which the onset of sonic flow increases the drag. Strouhal number variation is compared with the measurements of other authors. The paper concentrates on providing reliable measurements of vortex shedding and base pressure over the subsonic speed range rather than attempting to provide universal correlations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIAA JournalSame topicFluid Dynamics and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207