MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2042619796 · doi:10.1117/12.435594

<title>Fiber optic sensing for civil infrastructure</title>

2001· article· en· W2042619796 on OpenAlexaffabout
R. C. Tennyson, Aftab A. Mufti, K.W. Neale

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterferometryFiber Bragg gratingOptical fiberFiber optic sensorCivil infrastructureCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Computer scienceDisplacement (psychology)OpticsGauge (firearms)TelecommunicationsMaterials sciencePhysicsEngineeringCivil engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an overview of ISIS Canada's development and application of fiber optic sensing systems in a variety of civil infrastructure projects. Three types of fiber optic sensors have been utilized in ISIS projects-to-date: fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs), Fabry-Perot sensors, based on measuring displacement between two fibers; and a new sensor called a `long gauge (LG)', which employs a low coherence interferometry technique to measure deformations over gauge lengths ranging from 10 cm to 40 m. Details on the operation of the LG system are described below. Applications of the FBG and LG sensors are given for several ISIS projects that also involved the rehabilitation and strengthening of concrete structures using advanced composite materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1270.050

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE→Same topicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors→French-language works237,207→