MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2042620826 · doi:10.1029/2001gl013514

Simulations of Heinrich Events in a coupled ocean‐atmosphere‐sea ice model

2002· article· en· W2042620826 on OpenAlexaff
Katrin J. Meißner, Andreas Schmittner, Edward C. Wiebe, Andrew J. Weaver

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeltwaterGeologyIcebergIce sheetClimatologySea iceAtmosphere (unit)Northern HemisphereClimate modelNorth Atlantic Deep WaterOceanographyCryosphereIce-sheet modelAntarctic sea iceGlacial periodThermohaline circulationClimate changeMeteorologyGeomorphologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Between 20 and 80 kyr ago several cooling cycles occurred in the Northern Hemisphere which culminated in a discharge of icebergs into the North Atlantic. These so called “Heinrich Events” (HEs) were followed by an abrupt shift to a warmer climate. Here we use a coupled ocean‐atmosphere‐sea ice model to study the response of the climate system under glacial conditions to a hypothetical HE. The HE is simulated by meltwater discharges and combined changes in land albedo and ice sheet topography mimicking a break‐up of a considerable part of the Laurentide ice sheet. Despite very different initial strengths of the overturning circulation in the Northern Hemisphere, the model response to the HEs is qualitatively similar. A warming of ocean and atmosphere temperatures due to the topography/albedo changes is simulated after the iceberg discharge. North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW) formation drops and reestablishes due to the meltwater event.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research Letters→Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→