MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042632928 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2014-3386

Abstract 3386: Post-translational mechanisms related to PAR-4 regulation in endometrial cancer

2014· article· en· W2042632928 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin Brasseur, Sophie Parent, François Fabi, Éric Asselin

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topic14-3-3 protein interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresInnovation and Economic Development Trois Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCisplatinApoptosisEndometrial cancerCancer researchCancerLactacystinProstate cancerProteasomeCancer cellChemistryCell cultureMolecular biologyBiologyProteasome inhibitorInternal medicineCell biologyMedicineBiochemistryChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Prostate Apoptosis Response-4 (PAR-4) is a tumor suppressor protein whose expression level in cancer is frequently decreased; however it is neither mutated nor suppressed. A unique feature of PAR-4 is that it can induce apoptosis selectively in cancer cells without destroying normal cells, giving it an interest in anti-cancer targeted therapy. PAR-4 is not only regulated at the expression level, but also post-translationally by phosphorylation and protein cleavage. Most recently, the caspase-3 cleaved form of PAR-4 has been demonstrated by our laboratory and this fragment might be responsible for PAR-4 apoptosis mechanism. In the present study, we have investigated the mechanisms regulating PAR-4 and its cleaved form in endometrial cancer cell lines. Using endometrial cisplatin-sensitive cell line (Ishikawa) and endometrial cisplatin-resistant cell lines (HEC-1A), we compared expression level of PAR-4 and its cleaved form (cl.PAR-4) after treatment with cisplatin. PAR-4 level was decreased more in sensitive cancer cells and cl.PAR-4 was then increased indicating a possible link with chemoresistance. To further investigate mechanisms by which cl.PAR-4 is linked to apoptosis, we produced stable Ishikawa and HEC-1A cells clones expressing cl.PAR-4-MYC using lentiviral particles. Our first observations were that, upon cisplatin treatment, cl.PAR-4-MYC protein level was increased while cDNA level was stable indicating post-translational mechanisms regulating cl.PAR-4. Using proteasome inhibitors, MG-132 and lactacystin, cl.PAR-4-MYC expression level increased indicating a link between cl.PAR-4 and the proteasome. We also investigated the role of AKT in relation with cl.PAR-4 using the PI3K inhibitor Wortmannin. Results indicated that pAKT negatively regulate cl.PAR-4-MYC dose-dependently. We also found out that phospho-PAR-4 Thr163 is highly expressed in mutated-PTEN endometrial cancer cell line Ishikawa and RL95-2 which are expressing high level of phospho-AKT. We investigated the localization of PAR-4 and cl.PAR-4 using cytoplasmic/nuclear fractionation and the results indicates that cl.PAR-4-MYC and endogenous PAR-4 are localized in both nucleus and cytoplasm while endogenous cl.PAR-4 is mainly cytosolic. This localization of cl.PAR-4 may have a role in its ability to induce apoptosis like full length PAR-4. Finally, bioinformatic analyses have been done to suggest potential ubiquitination sites and phosphorylation sites responsible for the regulation of cleaved PAR-4. Further analyses of the post-translational mechanisms involved in cl.PAR-4 activity still need to be investigated to better understand the regulation of this potential tumor suppressor. By better understanding the mechanisms of PAR-4 and its cleaved form, we may be able to utilize this protein to sensitize chemoresistant endometrial cancer cells to chemotherapy. These findings may open new treatment options against endometrial cancers. Citation Format: Kevin Brasseur, Sophie Parent, François Fabi, Éric Asselin. Post-translational mechanisms related to PAR-4 regulation in endometrial cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 3386. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-3386

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topic14-3-3 protein interactionsFrench-language works237,207