HER2/neu and Ki-67 as Prognostic Indicators in Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of Salivary Glands
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma is the most common salivary gland malignancy, representing up to 30% of all cases. Despite attempts to correlate histopathologic grades to clinical outcomes, some histologically "low"-grade lesions continue to behave aggressively despite appropriate treatment. OBJECTIVE: This preliminary study will attempt to evaluate the use of immunohistochemical markers HER2/neu and Ki-67 as prognostic markers of biologic aggressiveness for mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary glands. DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 42 patients with mucoepidermoid carcinoma of major and minor salivary glands treated between 1970 and 1995 was conducted. A combination of primary resection with or without postoperative irradiation was used. Histologic grading and correlation with outcome analyses are provided. RESULTS: In the current study, positive HER2/neu staining and strong Ki-67 staining occurred in patients with high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma, whereas low-grade carcinoma was correlated with negative or weak staining. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results indicate that, overall, the overexpression of both the HER2/neu and the Ki-67 oncoproteins may serve as prognostic markers for poor outcome in salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it