MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042661888 · doi:10.1139/e99-112

The subglacial geomorphology of southeast Alberta: evidence for subglacial meltwater erosion

2000· article· en· W2042661888 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Claire Beaney

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGeological Society of America
KeywordsGeologyMeltwaterLandformDrumlinGeomorphologyFluvialBedrockErosionGlacial landformGlacial periodPaleontologyIce streamMoraineCryosphereOceanographyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A coherent pattern of landforms in southeast Alberta forms a subglacial landform continuum. Scoured bedrock tracts, flutes, transverse bed forms, and tunnel channels in this continuum are inferred to be products of erosion by turbulent subglacial meltwater flows beneath the Laurentide Ice Sheet. Bedrock and glacigenic sediment are truncated by an erosional surface. Flutes and extensive boulder lags across the truncation surface strongly suggest erosion by high-velocity turbulent flows. Tunnel channels dissect the erosion surface and record channelization of earlier sheet flows. Convex longitudinal profiles of channels indicate subglacial meltwater flow. Northeast-southwest trending transverse bed forms are superimposed on the preglacial divide and may be either glaciotectonic ridges or fluvial bed forms. Landforms reflect the dominance of erosion in the subglacial environment, likely by catastrophic meltwater flows of the Livingstone Lake megaflood event. The subglacial meltwater hypothesis accounts for each of the above landforms observed in southeast Alberta and suggests a less complex subglacial system than hypotheses requiring multiple processes to account for the landforms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2000
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207