Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gerald Gaudet, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières En se tournant du côté de l'intime, les romanciers des années quatre-vingt et quatre-vingt-dix se sont éloignés de la problématique nationale. Souvent confrontés à l'autre en eux-mêmes, les personnages entreprennent un retour vers l'origine, par lequel ils tentent de se réapproprier ce qui a pu être mal compris, vécu ou nommé. La fête du désir, de Madeleine Ouellette-Michalska, est un roman emblématique de cette période. Avec son amant, la narratrice déconstruit les logiques traditionnelles. Elle emprunte à la poésie et au langage de l'inconscient des dispositifs pour oser l'impossible : se libérer des limites de l'âge, du sexe et de l'apprentissage. Comment redevenir l'enfant du désir? Comment accepter une légitimité autre? Avec ces questions qui prennent leur ancrage dans la psychanalyse, l'auteure ouvre la voie à une relecture de l'histoire du roman québécois, nourrie par la question des genres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.023 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".