MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042702856 · doi:10.1002/cncr.20418

The risk of central nervous system metastases after trastuzumab therapy in patients with breast carcinoma

2004· article· en· W2042702856 on OpenAlex
Rose Lai, Chau T. Dang, Mark G. Malkin, Lauren E. Abrey

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityHamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTrastuzumabInternal medicineOncologyBreast cancerOdds ratioRetrospective cohort studyBreast carcinomaConfidence intervalLymph nodeMetastatic breast cancerCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab, which is a large monoclonal antibody that is efficacious in the treatment of patients with HER-2/neu-overexpressing, metastatic breast carcinoma, does not penetrate the blood-brain barrier and, thus, may allow the brain to become a sanctuary site for micrometastases. Few studies have compared the risk of central nervous system (CNS) metastases in patients treated with or without trastuzumab. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study that compared 264 patients who did not receive trastuzumab therapy with 79 patients who received trastuzumab therapy. The study was powered to detect an effect size of 0.3, which was deemed clinically significant to change future management. RESULTS: CNS metastases developed in 48.1% of patients on trastuzumab-based therapy and in 46.6% of patients on nontrastuzumab-based therapy. The association between trastuzumab therapy and subsequent CNS metastases (either brain or leptomeningeal) was not significant, with a multivariate-adjusted odds ratio of 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.88; P = 0.79). Similarly, there was no evidence of an association between trastuzumab and brain metastases alone (P = 0.67) or leptomeningeal metastases alone (P = 0.14). The median overall survival after the diagnosis of all CNS metastases was 26.3 months for patients who did not receive trastuzumab and 24.9 months for patients who received trastuzumab (P = 0.7). A multivariate logistic regression model found that patient age at diagnosis (P < 0.05), positive lymph node status at presentation (P < 0.01), and liver metastases (P < 0.01) were significant predictors of CNS metastases. Lung metastases showed a borderline significant P value (0.056). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the impression of many oncologists, the results of this study did not support an association between trastuzumab therapy and an increased risk of CNS metastases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it