High-precision nonadiabatic calculations of dynamic polarizabilities and hyperpolarizabilities for low-lying vibrational-rotational states of hydrogen molecular ions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The static and dynamic electric multipolar polarizabilities and second hyperpolarizabilities of the ${{\mathrm{H}}_{2}}^{+}$, ${{\mathrm{D}}_{2}}^{+}$, and ${\mathrm{HD}}^{+}$ molecular ions in the ground and first excited states are calculated nonrelativistically using explicitly correlated Hylleraas basis sets. The calculations are fully nonadiabatic; the Born-Oppenheimer approximation is not used. Comparisons are made with published theoretical and experimental results, where available. In our approach, no derivatives of energy functions nor derivatives of response functions are needed. In particular, we make contact with earlier calculations in the Born-Oppenheimer calculation where polarizabilities were decomposed into electronic, vibrational, and rotational contributions and where hyperpolarizabilities were determined from derivatives of energy functions. We find that the static hyperpolarizability for the ground state of ${\mathrm{HD}}^{+}$ is seven orders of magnitude larger than the corresponding dipole polarizability. For the dipole polarizability of ${\mathrm{HD}}^{+}$ in the first excited state the high precision of the present method facilitates treatment of a near cancellation between two terms. For applications to laser spectroscopy of trapped ions we find tune-out and magic wavelengths for the ${\mathrm{HD}}^{+}$ ion in a laser field. In addition, we also calculate the first few leading terms for long-range interactions of a hydrogen molecular ion and a ground state H, He, or Li atom.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".