MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042709213 · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.012524

High-precision nonadiabatic calculations of dynamic polarizabilities and hyperpolarizabilities for low-lying vibrational-rotational states of hydrogen molecular ions

2014· article· en· W2042709213 on OpenAlexaff
Li-Yan Tang, Zong-Chao Yan, Ting-Yun Shi, J. F. Babb

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPolarizabilityAtomic physicsIonExcited stateDipoleGround stateHyperpolarizabilityPotential energyChemistryDiatomic moleculePhysicsMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The static and dynamic electric multipolar polarizabilities and second hyperpolarizabilities of the ${{\mathrm{H}}_{2}}^{+}$, ${{\mathrm{D}}_{2}}^{+}$, and ${\mathrm{HD}}^{+}$ molecular ions in the ground and first excited states are calculated nonrelativistically using explicitly correlated Hylleraas basis sets. The calculations are fully nonadiabatic; the Born-Oppenheimer approximation is not used. Comparisons are made with published theoretical and experimental results, where available. In our approach, no derivatives of energy functions nor derivatives of response functions are needed. In particular, we make contact with earlier calculations in the Born-Oppenheimer calculation where polarizabilities were decomposed into electronic, vibrational, and rotational contributions and where hyperpolarizabilities were determined from derivatives of energy functions. We find that the static hyperpolarizability for the ground state of ${\mathrm{HD}}^{+}$ is seven orders of magnitude larger than the corresponding dipole polarizability. For the dipole polarizability of ${\mathrm{HD}}^{+}$ in the first excited state the high precision of the present method facilitates treatment of a near cancellation between two terms. For applications to laser spectroscopy of trapped ions we find tune-out and magic wavelengths for the ${\mathrm{HD}}^{+}$ ion in a laser field. In addition, we also calculate the first few leading terms for long-range interactions of a hydrogen molecular ion and a ground state H, He, or Li atom.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207