MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A prospective comparison of simultaneous and sequential live-donor renal transplantation1

2002· article· en· W2042773031 on OpenAlexaff
Richard Baverstock, Alana Manson, Li Liu, William A. Gourlay

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalProvidence Health Care
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreatinineMedicineRenal functionUrologyUrinary systemTransplantationKidneyKidney transplantationProspective cohort studySurgeryExcretionCold storageInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, we have performed live- donor renal transplantations sequentially with a cold ischemic time (preservation time) of approximately 3 hr. By performing live-donor renal transplantations simultaneously, cold ischemic times can be reduced to 30 min or less. The purpose of this prospective study was to compare clinical outcomes and biologic markers of kidney function between live-donor renal transplantations performed either simultaneously or sequentially. METHODS: Nine consecutive live-donor renal transplantations were performed in a simultaneous manner by two transplant surgeons. For comparison, 18 consecutive live-donor transplantations were performed sequentially by a single surgeon. Donor and recipient demographic factors, before transplantation, were compared. Posttransplantation comparisons included daily serum creatinine measurements for 5 days, urinary excretion of N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) for 72 hr postoperatively, nuclear glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at 18 hr postoperatively, creatinine clearance at 96 hr postoperatively, and creatinine clearance at 3 and 6 months posttransplantation. RESULTS: There were no differences in donor and recipient demographic factors preoperatively between the two groups. With simultaneous and sequential recipients, only the cold ischemic times were significantly different (simultaneous: mean=23.6 min; sequential: mean=191.7 min; P<0.01). After transplantation, no differences were detected in the daily fall of serum creatinine, nuclear GFR at 18 hr, or creatinine clearance at 96 hr, 3 months, or 6 months. In both groups, urinary NAG excretion reached a peak at 1 hr postoperatively and then slowly returned to baseline by 72 hr. There was no difference in the amount of NAG excretion between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that there is no difference in tubular injury or postoperative GFR in live-donor kidney transplantations performed simultaneously or sequentially. Our findings indicate that a modest prolongation of the cold ischemic time has no detectable influence on posttransplantation renal function for live-donor transplantations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score0.602

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantationSame topicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207