MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042793002 · doi:10.1353/fge.2012.0012

“Scarce Half Made Up”: Contemporary Memoir and Its Discontents

2012· article· en· W2042793002 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wendy Rawlings

Bibliographic record

VenueFourth Genre Explorations in Nonfiction · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShort Stories in Global Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemoirArt historyGeorge (robot)State (computer science)ConvictArtSociologyHistoryLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“Scarce Half Made Up”Contemporary Memoir and Its Discontents Wendy Rawlings (bio) Meghan O’Rourke, The Long Goodbye: A Memoir. NEW YORK: RIVERHEAD, 2011. 320 PAGES, HARDCOVER, $25.95; PAPER, $16.00. Frederick Exley, Pages from a Cold Island. 1975; NEW YORK: VINTAGE, 1989. 274 PAGES, PAPER, PRICE VARIES, OUT OF PRINT. Jamaica Kincaid, A Small Place. 1988; NEW YORK: FARRAR, STRAUS AND GIROUX, 2000. 81 PAGES, $13.00. Geoffrey Wolff, The Duke of Deception: Memories of My Father. 1979; NEW YORK: VINTAGE, 1990. 275 PAGES, PAPER, $14.95. Tobias Wolff, This Boy’s Life: A Memoir. 1989; NEW YORK: GROVE, 2000. 304 PAGES, PAPER, $15.95. For two years while I was in graduate school, I taught night classes at Utah State University’s extension campus in Tooele, 60 miles west of Salt Lake City and home to the Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility, a U.S. Army facility that dismantles chemical weapons. My students were a diverse bunch: Mormons just back from their missions, homemakers returning to school after raising their children, young guys who had already served in the military, a man in his mid-20s with cerebral palsy who was confined to a wheelchair and brought his mother and a note taker to every class. One thing [End Page 191] they had in common, though, was a love of parables. As we read stories by Alice Munro and Raymond Carver, they voiced their suspicion of stories that didn’t confer judgment on characters. Munro’s adulteresses, they argued, should be ostracized from their communities until they publicly admitted their wrongdoing. Carver’s alcoholics should go to rehab and then church. Gaining self-knowledge or feeling remorse wasn’t enough; the character must suffer and learn a lesson and be redeemed. I found myself frustrated by the consistency of the pattern. Did a story always have to feature one character undergoing one very specific personal trial? Did a lesson always have to be learned? Did the character always have to be healed or find redemption? I was reminded of my students’ fondness for parables when I read the current online debate about the viability of memoir as a genre that arose after Lorrie Moore published an essay-review on this subject in the New York Review of Books. Moore asks whether memoirs of bereavement, such as Meghan O’Rourke’s recent The Long Goodbye, or Jill Bialosky’s History of a Suicide: My Sister’s Unfinished Life, have the literary chops to justify themselves. (She views Jerry McGill’s Dear Marcus: Speaking to the Man Who Shot Me more favorably.) She suggests that the raw material of these writers’ lives might be better served by fiction, which allows for “deep imagining, revealing design, and solid construction of heroines.” Further, Moore claims that many memoirs fail to move beyond detailing the writer’s “psychic injury,” which, she laments, cannot be subjected to “objective criticism.” To attempt to criticize someone’s account of her battle with alcoholism or her mother’s death from cancer, Lorrie Moore says, “is like quarreling with a fish.” Brevity editor and nonfiction writer Dinty Moore takes issue with what he perceives to be Lorrie Moore’s preference for fiction over the “inferior genre” of memoir, and asks plaintively, “We work hard to make our memoirs compelling, artful and true. Why all the hating?” I take issue with the idea that imagining deeply, designing elegantly, and constructing solidly are by definition more fiction’s domain than the memoir’s. The best exemplars of both genres share the ability to use language and form in ways that reinvent and invigorate their genres and illuminate human experience. A well-written memoir requires as much imagination as does a good novel, though the memoir’s clearer tether to real-life events makes it appear to require attention to just the facts, ma’am. But I don’t buy that argument. In some ways, a good memoir is especially hard to write because the writer [End Page 192] must imaginatively reshape the raw material of his or her experience, rather than rely on the scaffold of experience to provide the story’s structure and meaning. Herein lies the problem...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.743

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFourth Genre Explorations in NonfictionSame topicShort Stories in Global LiteratureFrench-language works237,207