Resolving complex fibre architecture by means of sparse spherical deconvolution in the presence of isotropic diffusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) improves upon more traditional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in its ability to resolve the orientations of crossing and branching neural fibre tracts. The HARDI signals are measured over a spherical shell in q-space, and are usually used as an input to q-ball imaging (QBI) which allows estimation of the diffusion orientation distribution functions (ODFs) associated with a given region-of interest. Unfortunately, the partial nature of single-shell sampling imposes limits on the estimation accuracy. As a result, the recovered ODFs may not possess sufficient resolution to reveal the orientations of fibre tracts which cross each other at acute angles. A possible solution to the problem of limited resolution of QBI is provided by means of spherical deconvolution, a particular instance of which is sparse deconvolution. However, while capable of yielding high-resolution reconstructions over spacial locations corresponding to white matter, such methods tend to become unstable when applied to anatomical regions with a substantial content of isotropic diffusion. To resolve this problem, a new deconvolution approach is proposed in this paper. Apart from being uniformly stable across the whole brain, the proposed method allows one to quantify the isotropic component of cerebral diffusion, which is known to be a useful diagnostic measure by itself.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".