MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042798259 · doi:10.1080/13576280600783679

Development of the community-oriented medical education curriculum of Pakistan: A case report on the national initiative on curriculum development

2006· article· en· W2042798259 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEducation for Health · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInnovations in Medical Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumCurriculum developmentCurriculum mappingMedical educationPolitical scienceMedicineEngineering ethicsSociologyPedagogyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The medical curriculum in Pakistan includes the following courses: anatomy,physiology, and biochemistry. These courses are offered in the first two yearsusing lectures, tutorials and laboratory work. In the last three years, pathology,pharmacology, forensics and community medicine courses are taught by usingclerkships in medicine, surgery, pediatrics, gynecology, obstetrics, and associ-ated health-related disciplines.The general objective of the undergraduate medical curriculum as specifiedby the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council (PMDC) is to provide com-passionate,generalpractice,community-orienteddoctorswhoarecommittedtomanage common health problems of the people in a scientifically sound andcost-effective manner while using appropriate technology and a holisticapproach. It also states that the doctor should be able to assume leadership ina health care team, function and communicate effectively as a manager inaccordance with the code of medical ethics prescribed by the PMDC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.381 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it