MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042822399 · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/90/6/065605

Parametric excitation of azimuthally non-symmetric surface waves propagating in metal waveguides filled with isotropic plasma

2015· article· en· W2042822399 on OpenAlexaff
V. O. Girka, Igor O. Girka, R. D. Sydora, O Ivahnenko, Y Shkoda

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysica Scripta · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDust and Plasma Wave Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcitationParametric statisticsIsotropyPlasmaSurface waveSurface (topology)PhysicsMaterials scienceOpticsComputational physicsGeometryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper is devoted to developing the theory of parametric excitation of electromagnetic waves propagating across the axis of symmetry in cylindrical waveguides partially filled with isotropic plasma. The problem is studied theoretically in the fluid approximation and expressions for the wave fields are derived from Maxwell’s equations. The azimuthally non-symmetric electromagnetic waves propagate in the form of wave packets which are approximately described by the main azimuthal harmonic and two nearest satellite temporal harmonics. The boundary condition, which is cast in a nonlinear form, describes the flowing of a surface current on the plasma interface. This condition allows one to derive an infinite set of equations for harmonics of the tangential electric field of azimuthally non-symmetric surface waves. The dependence of the growth rate of the parametric instability of these waves on parameters of the plasma-filled waveguide and alternating electric field is studied both analytically and numerically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysica ScriptaSame topicDust and Plasma Wave PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207