Thermomechanical fatigue behaviour and mode of failure of laser welded single crystal Ni based superalloy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The baseline metallography of single crystal alloy N5 was compared with laser welded material to evaluate the effect of the welding process on cracking behaviour. In addition, baseline thermomechanical fatigue data were compared with the fatigue properties of welded specimens. The solution treated and aged single crystal alloy was found to contain microporosity, Ta rich MC carbides, Cr–Mo rich grain boundary borides, gamma prime and fine secondary gamma prime. In addition, recrystallised grains were present in the weld heat affected zone and provided a path for crack propagation out of the fusion zone. The laser beam welds showed defects mainly associated with the fusion zone, while thermomechanical fatigue analysis of the laser weld data showed inferior values compared to the baseline solution treated and aged material. Metallographic analysis showed that this was due to increased defects in the fusion zone associated with surface oxidation and heat affected zone recrystallisation compared to the non-welded alloy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it