MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042838210 · doi:10.1097/hjh.0b013e32831b7687

Diagnosis of primary aldosteronism: for medical management, not just surgery

2008· letter· en· W2042838210 on OpenAlexaffabout
J. David Spence

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hypertension · 2008
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Canadian institutionsThrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePrimary aldosteronismStroke (engine)Primary preventionResearch centreGeneral surgerySurgeryLibrary sciencePathologyAldosteroneInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stroke Prevention & Atherosclerosis Research Centre, Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada Correspondence to David Spence, Stroke Prevention & Atherosclerosis Research Centre, Robarts Research Institute, 1400 Western Road, London, N6G 2V2 Ontario, Canada Tel: +1 519 6 63 3113; fax+1 519 663 3018

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0160.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HypertensionSame topicHormonal Regulation and HypertensionFrench-language works237,207