Innovation ouverte et management de la propriété intellectuelle. Quelles stratégies dans le jeu vidéo ?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nombreuses sont les difficults de matrise et de valorisation des droits de proprit attachs l'innovation collaborative. La littrature indique une relation ngative entre le niveau d'ouverture du processus d'innovation et la dtention des droits de proprit. Toutefois, elle ne prcise ni le type de collaboration ni la nature des partenaires. travers l'tude de cinq studios de jeu vido, nous mettons en vidence que l'ouverture du processus d'innovation par une collaboration ferme avec des partenaires implique une relation ngative entre niveau d'ouverture et dtention des droits de proprit intellectuelle. l'inverse, une collaboration ouverte sur des communauts d'utilisateurs conduit un lien positif.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it