Mirror Neurons and Visuo-Motor Images in Children: A Meta-Analysis of Piaget and Inhelder's Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using a meta-analysis of Piaget and Inhelder's (1966) data on static reproductive images, we examined the link between Piaget's theory of mental imagery and the motor cognition hypothesis (MCH), which reflects the functional aspect of the mirror neuron systems. We confirmed that reproduction of complex visual models mediated by visuo-motor images was facilitated much more by children's own activity than simple observation of either the model or someone else's reconstruction. Critically, the influence of imitation over the images did not change with children's age. Thus, as Piaget hypothesized, imagery may indeed have a very close relationship with imitation. However, lack of age effects shows that the type of imitation involved in visuo-motor imagery likely does not develop gradually, as predicted by Piaget, but rather it may be grounded on mirror neurons. The latter may be interpreted as the plausible biological substrate of accommodation, validating a cornerstone of Piaget's general theory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".