MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042862192 · doi:10.1063/1.2733600

Interfacial strengthening by soft phase in lamellar microstructure of TiAl alloys

2007· article· en· W2042862192 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLamellar structureMaterials scienceCreepMicrostructurePhase (matter)Volume fractionMetallurgyDeformation (meteorology)Composite materialChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors report a mechanism of interfacial strengthening during creep deformation of fully lamellar TiAl alloys. In the lamellar microstructure of TiAl alloys, the α2 phase or the β phase is softer than the γ phase at elevated temperature. Conventionally, the creep resistance increases with decreasing the volume fraction of the soft phases. However, the lamellar interfaces of γ∕α2 or γ∕β retard the motion of dislocations during creep, causing a great strengthening, and thus the creep resistance increases with increasing the amount of the phase interfaces. In this study, a physically based model is developed to explain the strengthening behavior of the soft phases in lamellar TiAl alloys.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.720

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it