MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042866844 · doi:10.1353/jmh.0.0279

Betrayed: Scandal, Politics, and Canadian Naval Leadership (review)

2009· article· en· W2042866844 on OpenAlex
William Schleihauf

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Military History · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNavyPoliticsCraftGlobeLawCharge (physics)Political scienceHistorySpanish Civil WarManagementEconomic historyMedia studiesSociologyArchaeologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Betrayed: Scandal, Politics, and Canadian Naval Leadership William Schleihauf Betrayed: Scandal, Politics, and Canadian Naval Leadership. By Richard O. Mayne. Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press, 2007. ISBN 978-0-7748-1296-2. Photographs. Illustrations. Appendixes. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Pp. xii, 279. CAN$29.95. Politics. They beset any organization; occasionally for the greater good, all too often to the detriment of the whole. Navies are no exception. The history of the Royal Canadian Navy (RCN) is very much one of politics, both internal and external – indeed, its very survival has always been mired in political controversy. In Betrayed, Richard Mayne takes up the story of one political tempest that culminated in the ousting of the professional head of the RCN – all of this at the height of the Second World War. When Canada declared war on the 10th of September, 1939, the Canadian Navy was a tiny force of six destroyers and a handful of trawlers. By war's end, this flotilla-sized fleet had turned into a truly blue-water navy: two light fleet carriers; a pair of powerful light cruisers; modern fleet destroyers; myriad landing craft and supporting vessels; and above all, an immense anti-submarine force. HMC ships had seen action around the globe, and forces were being deployed for the culminating stages of the fight against Imperial Japan. No organization can be expected to undergo a fifty-fold expansion (from fewer than 2,000 regular force officers and men to some 110,000 serving personnel, all volunteers) without growing pains, and those the RCN had aplenty. Getting that vast influx of men properly trained, and keeping them upto date with the latest techniques and tactics was a huge challenge in and of itself. Combined with the rapid pace of technological development (radar, new anti-submarine warfare weaponry and associated electronics), and the need to repair and upgrade existing vessels – with insufficient shipyard capacity and in [End Page 676] competition with other industries and the other services for skilled and semi-skilled labour – the existing naval infrastructure had difficulty coping. It is very much to the credit of the Chief of the Naval Staff Vice-Admiral Percy Nelles, and Naval Staff Headquarters (NSHQ), that the Navy did as well as it did. Nevertheless, several disastrous convoys highlighted serious shortcomings in the RCN's capabilities. The focus of Canada's naval war was the fight against the German U-boat, and to accomplish this, the Naval Staff was forced to juggle a number of competing issues. The maximum number of escorts and escort groups had to be kept at sea at all times, but those ships needed maintenance and had to be upgraded with the latest technology – by a shipbuilding industry working at capacity. Trained manpower was in short supply, and needed to be spread as widely as possible; while ship captains did their best to keep their crews together. There was, of course, the normal disconnect between those at sea, unaware of the overall picture, and the shore-based administrators, seemingly disinterested in the concerns of those bouncing about the North Atlantic. Moreover, there was tension felt by many "Wavy Navy" (Royal Canadian Naval Volunteer Reserve, i.e. RCNVR) officers unaccustomed to a stricter discipline and more rigid hierarchy than experienced in private life: some felt that the regular RCN was biased against them. This is the situation described in Betrayed. Interlocking networks of RCNVR officers (ofttimes lawyers) were able to use connections from their prewar careers to pass sometimes faulty, often incomplete, information about the problems in the "Corvette Navy" up to the highest levels, outside of proper channels. Very dangerous politically. Mayne untangles the various threads that connected all the players, and explores the roles played by men ranging from the Naval Minister Angus Macdonald and his executive assistant John Joseph Connolly down through the members of the Naval Staff, and senior British officers in Liverpool. Ultimately, Percy Nelles would pay the price. Not neglected is the cut-throat and competitive world of the prewar RCN officers, each trying to gain every inch in the all-important promotion game. Unfortunately, those shenanigans were not put aside by all senior officers, even during the war...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.500
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it