Acardiac twin pregnancy with neonatal resolution of donor twin cardiomyopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Twin reverse arterial perfusion, as with acardiac fetuses, is a rare complication of multifetal pregnancy. Prognosis of the donor twin is guarded because of the high risk of cardiac failure, polyhydramnios, and preterm delivery. CASE: A 40-year-old woman, gravida 4, para 3, was diagnosed at 19 weeks' gestation with a twin pregnancy complicated by an acardiac, acephalic fetus. Serial amniocenteses were done to decompress the hydramnios between 27 and 33 weeks. Ultrasonography showed ventricular septal hypertrophy in the donor twin at 27 weeks, and cesarean delivery was done at 33 weeks. The neonatal course was complicated by hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, which resolved without sequelae by 1 year of age. CONCLUSION: Antenatal sonographic monitoring of interventricular septal thickness can be a useful marker to predict neonatal cardiac sequelae.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".