The BmE75 Nuclear Receptors Function as Dominant Repressors of the Nuclear Receptor BmHR3A
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The orphan nuclear receptors BmE75 and BmHR3 are induced by 20-hydroxyecdysone in the ovary of the silk moth Bombyx mori at the beginning of pupation and show stage-specific expression in ovarian follicles during pharate adult development. To analyze the function of these receptors, we have developed a transactivation assay based on the transcriptional stimulation of a retinoic acid receptor-related receptor response element (RORE)-linked promoter-reporter construct. Co-transfection of a Bombyx cell line with a BmHR3A expression construct results in constitutive activation of the reporter, whereas expression of BmE75 has no measurable effects on reporter expression. However, when the BmE75 receptors are co-introduced with BmHR3A into the cells, the BmHR3A-mediated transactivation is repressed. Repression of BmHR3A by BmE75 occurs by two distinct mechanisms. Increasing doses of BmE75 efficiently displace BmHR3A bound to the RORE target site in gel retardation assays, indicating that both receptors compete for common DNA target sites. However, analysis of the function of deletion mutants of BmE75 in the transactivation assay indicates that repression can also occur in the absence of the DNA-binding domain and that the C-terminal F domain is sufficient for repression. In gel retardation assays, the two receptor types form a ternary complex on a single RORE, suggesting that repression is also mediated by protein interactions on the DNA target site. Yeast two-hybrid assays show that BmHR3A interacts with BmE75 and that this interaction is dependent on the C terminus of BmHR3A and the F domain of BmE75. Because the C terminus of BmHR3A contains a strong activation domain, we predict that BmE75 blocks activation by BmHR3A through competition for co-activator binding sites located at the C terminus of BmHR3A. Our data also indicate that the transcriptional activities of BmHR3A and BmE75 are integrated in such a way that activation of RORE-linked target genes depends on the relative expression levels of the two receptor types.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".