Effect of Oxygen on Sleep and Breathing in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease at Moderate Altitude
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of oxygen on sleep and breathing in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) in Mexico City, at 2,240 m of altitude. PARTICIPANTS: Nineteen ILD patients with a mean FVC of 58 +/- 17% pred. (SD) and a mean PaO(2) of 51 +/- 6 mm Hg were recruited from a pulmonary clinic in a tertiary referral center. In addition, 14 normal control subjects, matched for age and gender, were studied. All patients underwent two consecutive full polysomnographies (PSG), one breathing room air and one breathing supplementary oxygen through nasal prongs, in random order. Controls were studied for one night breathing room air. RESULTS: The mean oxygen saturation (SaO(2)) in ILD patients was 82.3 +/- 9.1% during sleep on air and 94.8 +/- 2.9% on oxygen (p < 0.001). In controls it was 92.9 +/- 1.9% (p < 0.001). Sleep efficiency was similar in patients and controls (75 vs. 82%, p > 0.05) and did not change with oxygen (77%). Arousal index was 12.4 +/- 6.9.h(-1) in ILD patients breathing room air and 12.9 +/- 9.1.h(-1) breathing oxygen while in controls it was 11.4 +/- 5.4.h(-1). Breathing frequency (f) during sleep was 24.7 +/- 4.2 in ILD patients and decreased breathing oxygen to 22.5 +/- 3.6 (p < 0.001) but was still higher than in controls (15.6 +/- 2.7; p < 0.001). Similarly, the heart rate (HR) in ILD and controls was 79 +/- 12 and 68 +/- 8, respectively (p < 0.001), and decreased to 68 +/- 4 when patients breathed oxygen (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Oxygen substantially decreases HR and f, but does not normalize the f in ILD patients. The impact of hypoxia on sleep efficiency and arousal index was not demonstrable in our patients acclimatized to moderate altitude.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it