Bibliographic record
Abstract
The problem of dual-hop transmission from a source to a destination via two parallel full-duplex relays in block Rayleigh fading environment is investigated. All nodes in the network are assumed to be oblivious to their forward channel gains; however, they have perfect information about their backward channel gains. We also assume a stringent decoding delay constraint of one fading block that makes the definition of ergodic (Shannon) capacity meaningless. The focus of this paper is on simple, efficient, and practical relaying schemes to increase the expected-rate at the destination. For this purpose, various combinations of relaying protocols and the broadcast approach (multi-layer coding) are proposed. For the decode-forward (DF) relaying, the maximum finite-layer expected-rate as well as two upper-bounds on the continuous-layer expected-rate are obtained. The main feature of the proposed DF scheme is that the layers being decoded at both relays are added coherently at the destination although each relay has no information about the number of layers being successfully decoded by the other relay. It is proved that the optimal coding scheme is transmitting uncorrelated signals via the relays. Next, the maximum expected-rate of ON/OFF based amplify-forward (AF) relaying is analytically derived. For further performance improvement, a hybrid decode-amplify-forward (DAF) relaying strategy, adopting the broadcast approach at the source and relays, is proposed and its maximum throughput and maximum finite-layer expected-rate are presented. Moreover, the maximum throughput and maximum expected-rate in the compress-forward (CF) relaying adopting the broadcast approach, using optimal quantizers and Wyner-Ziv compression at the relays, are fully derived. All theoretical results are illustrated by numerical simulations. As it turns out from the results, when the ratio of the relay power to the source power is high, the CF relaying outperforms DAF (and hence outperforms both DF and AF relaying); otherwise, DAF scheme is superior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".