Integrin β1 Is Necessary for the Maintenance of Corneal Structural Integrity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The precise role of a normal keratocyte in maintaining corneal structural integrity is unclear; it is generally considered to remain quiescent at the end of cell division. Given that integrins are essential for cell/extracellular matrix interactions, the authors tested the hypothesis that integrin expression by keratocytes is essential for corneal structure and function. METHODS: Using a tamoxifen-dependent cre recombinase expressed under the control of a fibroblast-specific promoter/enhancer, the authors conditionally deleted the integrin β1 (Itgb1) gene in mouse keratocytes during the postnatal matrix maturation phase of the cornea. The effects of this deletion were monitored histologically and by macroscopic observation of the cornea. RESULTS: The resultant cornea shows an initial thinning of the stroma, reduced space between collagen fibrils, loss of epithelial layers and subsequent edema, thickening of Descemet's membrane, and degenerative changes in the endothelial cell layer, with eventual scarring. These pathologic changes have some similarities to human corneal disease keratoconus. The phenotype did not develop when Itgb1 was deleted after complete corneal maturation. CONCLUSIONS: Loss of integrin β1 expression in keratocytes during the phase of stromal maturation results in corneal thinning and edema. Keratocyte-ECM interaction is essential for matrix maturation and thus in the maintenance of corneal structural integrity. This model has relevance in understanding corneal diseases such as keratoconus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".