Precipitation of pharmaceuticals using a supercritical anti‐solvent (SAS) dechnique: A preliminary study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The aims of this research were to investigate the applicability of the supercritical anti‐solvent (SAS) process on the precipitation of pharmaceuticals (andrographolide and acetaminophen). In particular, the goal of this research was to study the influence of pressure at 10 and 24 MPa on particle characteristics (morphology, crystalline structure, polymorphic form, size, size distribution, and precipitation yield), and to compare the precipitation efficiency of SAS process and evaporation process. Scanning electron microscope (SEM), X‐ray diffraction (XRD), and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) showed a significant change in particle size, size distribution, morphology, and precipitation yield, respectively. From an analysis of the results it was found that the crystal size of andrographolide and acetaminophen decreased with increasing pressure. The morphology of andrographolide particles changed from slice‐like to column‐like when the pressure was increased. On the other hand, the acetaminophen particles obtained were found to be monoclinic form (I) under both operating pressures. The SAS process produced small uniform shaped crystals, with a narrow size distribution, high precipitation yield and selective precipitation were also observed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".