MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042922074 · doi:10.1021/la802284j

Interaction of Substituted Aromatic Compounds with Graphene

2008· article· en· W2042922074 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSurface Chemistry and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalPolytechnique MontréalRegroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de Pointe
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrapheneAdsorptionMoleculeDensity functional theoryBenzeneChemistryHydrogen bondComputational chemistryChemical physicsAromaticityAtomic orbitalIntermolecular forceInteraction energyHydrogenOrganic chemistryMaterials scienceNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have modeled the adsorption of various substituted derivatives of benzene on a graphene sheet, using a first-principles density functional theory-local density approximation method. The presence of functional groups can significantly alter the overall magnitude of pi-pi interactions between the adsorbed molecules and graphene by giving rise to strong medium-range interactions involving pi-orbitals of the substituents. When the substituents can simultaneously permit the formation of hydrogen bonds between adsorbed molecules, it is possible to evaluate the relative contributions of hydrogen bonding and pi-based interactions to the overall adsorption. Adsorption of individual molecules and hydrogen-bonded aggregates reflects a hierarchical balance of the different interactions that determine the overall energy of adsorption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it