ON THE SHEET BREAKUP OF DIRECT-INJECTION GASOLINE PRESSURE-SWIRL ATOMIZER SPRAYS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An experimental study into the sheet breakup mechanisms of two direct-injection gasoline pressure-swirl atomizers has been performed under conditions of varying fuel pressure and injector back pressure. A novel method of illumination, which allows a single thickness of the hollow-cone spray to be examined, has been developed. The results of the study indicate that there are three major mechanisms contributing to the ultimate disintegration of the liquid sheet, namely, aerodynamic instability, perforated sheet breakup, and air-core induced disturbances. The relative importance of the breakup mechanisms is shown to depend on atomizer operating condition and nozzle geometry. Sheet breakup lengths determined experimentally by a void-fraction analysis were compared with the predictions of three breakup models from the literature. The comparison suggests that the models underpredict the breakup length under all but substantially subatmospheric back-pressure conditions. The results also indicate that special care is required when using existing breakup models where atomizers with offset-nozzle geometries are used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it