A model for predicting human-caused wildfire occurrence in the region of Madrid, Spain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes the development and validation of a spatio-temporal model for human-caused wildfire occurrence prediction at a regional scale. The study area is the 8028-km2 region of Madrid, located in central Spain, where more than 90% of wildfires are caused by humans. We construct a logistic generalised additive model to estimate daily fire ignition risk at a 1-km2 grid spatial resolution. Spatially referenced socioeconomic and weather variables appear as covariates in the model. Spatial and temporal effects are also included. The variables in the model were selected using an iterative approach, which we describe. We use the model to predict the expected number of fires in our study area during the 2002–05 period, by aggregating the estimated probabilities over space–time scales of interest. The estimated partial effects of the presence of railways, roads, and wildland–urban interface in forest areas were highly significant, as were the observed daily maximum temperature and precipitation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".