MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042969596 · doi:10.1255/ejms.683

A Study of the Methane Catalyzed Isomerization of HCO <sup>+</sup> to HOC <sup>+</sup> and the Elimination of Methane from Metastable Methoxymethyl Cation

2004· article· en· W2042969596 on OpenAlexafffund
Travis D. Fridgen

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Mass Spectrometry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaWilfrid Laurier University
FundersWilfrid Laurier University
KeywordsIsomerizationDissociation (chemistry)MetastabilityChemistryMethaneCatalysisIonPhysical chemistryPhotochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electronic structure calculations on the methane catalyzed HCO + /HOC + potential energy surface have been conducted. The results show that 1,2-proton transfer from C to O can be efficiently catalyzed by CH 4 . The complex CH 4 /HCO + and the closely related species, CH 5 + /CO, are separated from the methoxymethyl cation CH 3 OCH 2 + by a large potential energy barrier. It follows from the calculations that the metastable methoxymethyl cation is very unlikely to dissociate to yield HOC + . New experiments also show that HOC + is not produced to any observable extent. A new explanation is proposed for the composite peak for m/z 29 observed from metastable dissociation of metastable methoxymethyl cation. The two components both arise from the formation of HCO + , but via different transition states. The minor, narrow, component involves dissociation from the CH 5 + /CO complex and the broad peak from the CH 4 /HCO + ion–molecule complex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Mass SpectrometrySame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207