MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042973944 · doi:10.1109/4234.917106

Credit-based processor sharing for decoupled delay and bandwidth allocation

2001· article· en· W2042973944 on OpenAlexaff
Jun Du, Jaewon Choe, Alberto Leon‐Garcia

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDynamic bandwidth allocationBandwidth (computing)Computer scienceProcessor sharingComputer networkBandwidth allocationChannel allocation schemesTelecommunicationsQueueing theoryWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a credit-based processor sharing (CPS) approach for decoupled allocation of delay and bandwidth. For bandwidth guarantees, a CPS system serves traffic flows in proportion to their service weights. For delay guarantees, on the other hand, a CPS system allows real-time flows to temporarily borrow bandwidth from nonreal-time flows using service credits. This borrowing mechanism boosts the delay performance of real-time flows without increasing their long-term bandwidth requirements. By systematically regulating service credits of real-time flows, nonreal-time flows are protected for their aggregate long-term bandwidth share.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207