MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dos saberes para ensinar aos saberes didatizados: uma análise da concepção de sequência didática segundo o isd e sua reconcepção na revista Nova Escola

2011· article· pt· W2042982137 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLinguagem em (Dis)curso · 2011
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Education Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Linguistic Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Considerando a abrangência nacional de uma das maiores revistas especializadas em educação do Brasil e seu possível papel nas representações construídas por professores a partir dos conteúdos por ela veiculados, este artigo tem como objetivo analisar o conceito de sequência didática segundo o ISD e sua transposição didática pela revista Nova Escola. Para análise, partimos dos conceitos defendidos pela didática de línguas de Genebra da linha Interacionista Sociodiscursiva (ISD) (SCHNEUWLY; DOLZ, 2004) e sua (re)interpretação no quadro de didáticas de línguas estrangeiras no Brasil (CRISTOVÃO 2005, 2007, 2009; PETRECHE, 2008; BEATO-CANATO, 2009). Os resultados revelam divergências entre o conceito de SD defendido pelo ISD e as SDs publicadas pela Revista.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it