Comparative assessment of genetic diversity between wild and cultivated barley using g<scp>SSR</scp> and <scp>EST</scp>‐<scp>SSR</scp> markers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Barley is an economically important cereal crop especially for feed and malt production, but its value as food is increasing due to various health benefits. Wild barley is the progenitor of modern day barley cultivars possessing a rich source of genetic variation for various biotic and abiotic stresses. Species‐specific molecular markers have great potential for efficient introgression of these important traits from wild to cultivated barley. In the present study, 140 microsatellite markers were screened to assess the genetic variation and species‐specific markers between wild and cultivated germplasm. Of these 140, a polymorphic set of 48 genomic (g SSR ) and 16 EST ‐ SSR s amplified a total of 685 alleles. Cluster analysis discriminated all 47 accessions and classified wild and cultivated genotypes into two distinct groups, according to their geographic origin. Our analysis indicated that g SSR s were more informative than EST ‐based SSR s. Results from PC o A analysis for species‐specific alleles clearly suggest that wild barley genotypes contain a higher number of unique alleles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it