MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043079379 · doi:10.3138/sem.v40.3.221

The Agonies of Choice: Gender, the Family, and Individualization in Birgit Vanderbeke's Das Muschelessen

2004· article· en· W2043079379 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alison Lewis

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminar A Journal of Germanic Studies · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman History and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommunismHappinessModernityPoliticsPopulationMarriage marketSociologyPolitical scienceGender studiesLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The massive changes that took place over a decade ago at the end of the Cold War with the unification of Germany and the collapse of Eastern European communism left virtually nothing in the lives of the citizens from the former GDR unaffected. With breathtaking speed one economic system was replaced by another, new political and legal systems were installed, and new social ground rules were imposed on the East German population. The social impact of these structural changes, which, in the words of sociologists Ulrich Beck and Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim, are attributable to sudden surges in (9), was immense and profound. In particular, the individualized society into which East Germans were inserted posed unprecedented challenges to love, marriage, and the family (Bauman, The Individualized Society). As GDR biographies were removed from their socialist life worlds and exposed to the vagaries of choice and the free market economy, the domains of love, marriage, and the nuclear family were also transformed in a myriad of ways. As these individualization processes accelerated with the exposure to what Zygmunt Bauman refers to eponymously as liquid modernity, there were colossal pressures on individuals and their families to maximize their opportunities for success and happiness in the West. Unification appeared to herald a new era of free choice in which individuals were able to avail themselves of the greater range of consumer goods and lifestyles. The advent of greater personal freedoms, however, also exacerbated the pressures on individuals and families to make the right choices in their lives, choices, for instance, that would increase their chances of success and help them attain the necessary accoutrements of status and class as quickly as possible. Not only were families swept up by a compulsion to consume (Hettlage and Lenz 191), they were also caught up in the race to acquire – and not merely of the economic kind. To succeed in the West they had to acquire the other less tangible forms of capital that, according to French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, represent key markers of distinction and difference in the modern world: social, cultural, and symbolic (The Field of Cultural Production). The agonies of choice that this race precipitated were to change drastically the nature of families and irrevoc-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0090.013
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminar A Journal of Germanic StudiesSame topicGerman History and SocietyFrench-language works237,207