Interstrand Cross-Links: A New Type of γ-Ray Damage in Bromodeoxyuridine-Substituted DNA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interstrand cross-links (ICL) represent one of the most toxic types of DNA damage for dividing cells. They are induced both by natural products (e.g., psoralens + UVA) and by several chemical agents, some of which are used in chemotherapy (e.g., carboplatin and mitomycin C). Although repair mechanisms exist for interstrand cross-links, these lesions can induce mutations, chromosomal rearrangements, and cell death. Here, we report, for the first time, the formation of ICL by gamma-rays in brominated DNA. It is well established that the radiosensitization properties of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) result primarily from the electrophilic nature of the bromine, making it a good leaving group and leading to the irreversible formation of a uridinyl radical (dUrd(*)) or uridinyl anion (dUrd-) upon addition of an electron. We observe that the radiolytic loss of the bromine atom is greatly suppressed in double-stranded compared to single-stranded DNA. We have used a model DNA containing a bulge, formed by five mismatched bases, and have observed a linear dose-response for the formation of strand breaks on the single-stranded regions of both the brominated strand and the opposite nonbrominated strand. Surprisingly, we have observed the formation of interstrand cross-links exclusively in the mismatched region. Thus, we propose that the radiosensitization effects of bromodeoxyuridine in vivo will almost certainly be limited to single strand regions such as found in transcription bubbles, replication forks, mismatched DNA, and possibly the loop region of telomeres. Our results suggest that interstrand cross-links may contribute to the radiosensitization effects of BrdUrd. These findings may have profound implications for the clinical use of bromodeoxyuridine as a radiosensitizer, as well as for the development of targeted radiosensitizers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".