MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043137026 · doi:10.1109/wiopt.2008.4586099

A Markovian model for mobile cellular networks with QoS differentiation

2008· preprint· en· W2043137026 on OpenAlexaff
Georges Nogueira, Bruno Baynat, Ahmed Ziram

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQuality of serviceCellular networkGeneral Packet Radio ServiceContext (archaeology)Markov processEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionDimensioningMobility modelDistributed computingMobile edge computingComputer networkMobile telephonyMobile radioServerTelecommunicationsWirelessEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a realistic and accurate analytical model to dimension mobile cellular networks with QoS differentiation. QoS per applicative flow is commonly defined in GPRS/EDGE or 3G systems where streaming applications with real time properties and elastic data applications have to share radio resources. The need for accurate and fast-computing tools is of primary importance to tackle complex and exhaustive dimensioning issues. In this paper, we present a generic QoS analytical model developed in the context of EDGE networks but that can be adapted to a different technology. We develop a Markovian model that takes into account the QoS differentiation between real time and non-real time classes and gives expressions for all the required performance parameters. We compare our model with simulation and show its accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207