H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> plays different roles in determining penetration failure in three diverse plant–fungal interactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fungal plant pathogens that attempt to penetrate and feed on living cells frequently trigger a localized plant defence response that results in fungal penetration failure. In the current study we demonstrate that breakdown products of the cell wall released by the localized application of hemicellulase elicit localized responses including, sequentially, extracellular H2O2 generation; accumulation of phenolic compounds; and cross-linking of proteins in the cell wall. In a detailed time-course study of three plant-fungus interactions that result in a high frequency of penetration failure, only one plant-fungus combination displayed a similar profile of responses to that induced by localized cell-wall degradation. The additional generation of extracellular O2- in one interaction, and the absence of phenolic compounds in the cell wall in another, demonstrate that plant responses to the penetration process may be influenced by activities of the penetrating fungus. Significantly, H2O2 generation was the only response detected in all three plant-fungal combinations at the correct time and place to account for penetration failure, and in all three combinations the enzymatic removal of H2O2 resulted in increased penetration success. Pharmacological studies suggest that in two of the three interactions, H2O2 generation required cytoskeletal involvement but was independent of transcription or translation, although inhibition of the latter processes increased fungal penetration. In at least one of these two interactions, the data suggest that H2O2 generation and new gene expression act within the same penetration-inhibiting pathway, possibly through the involvement of phenolic materials. However, enzymatic removal of H2O2 from the third interaction almost completely eliminated penetration failure, while interference with cytoplasmic processes had no effect, suggesting that H2O2 generation in this system did not require protoplast involvement and, alone, was necessary and sufficient to account for fungal penetration failure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".