MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043148218 · doi:10.1128/aac.02285-13

Reply to “Further Proofs of Concept for the Carba NP Test”

2014· letter· en· W2043148218 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nathalie Tijet, David A. Boyd, Samir Patel, Michael R. Mulvey, Roberto G. Melano

Bibliographic record

VenueAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · 2014
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter Research
Canadian institutionsResearch ManitobaPublic Health OntarioToronto Public Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematical proofTest (biology)Computer scienceMathematicsCalculus (dental)BiologyMedicineEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We acknowledge the [letter by Dortet et al.][1] ([1][2]) in response to our evaluation of the Carba NP test ([2][3]), performed in two independent Canadian laboratories (the National Microbiology Laboratory, the national reference lab, and Public Health Ontario, a provincial reference lab). In

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.053
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.053
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0690.051
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAntimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapySame topicEnterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter ResearchFrench-language works237,207