MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043193682 · doi:10.1353/smr.2011.0007

Narrating Terrorism: Kristina Konrad’s Große Freiheit, kleine Freiheit (2000)

2011· article· de· W2043193682 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Christina Gerhardt

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminar A Journal of Germanic Studies · 2011
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunism, Protests, Social Movements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolidarityCommunismPoliticsTerrorismDictatorPolitical scienceSocial movementHegemonyMedia studiesMarxist philosophyLawSociologyHumanitiesGender studiesReligious studiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Narrating Terrorism: Kristina Konrad’s Große Freiheit, kleine Freiheit (2000) Christina Gerhardt (bio) Around 1968 self-liberation and self-determination struggles rose up the globe over, seeking to challenge hegemonic structures in society, at the workplace, at universities, and at home. While these movements sought to address conditions domestically, they also expressed solidarity internationally. For example, as many of the speeches, writings, leaflets, banners at demonstrations, and films of the era testify, people around the world protested the U. S. war on Vietnam. Often citing and encapsulated by Che Guevara’s call (at the Tricontinental Conference of April 1967) for “Two, Three, Many Vietnams,” the movements expressed solidarity with the anticolonial, anti-imperialist, and self-determination struggles of the Vietcong, but they also drew inspiration from Che Guevara’s role in the 1959 Cuban Revolution, which overthrew CIA-backed Cuban dictator Fulgencio Batista. Additionally, these social movements drew on a broad spectrum of political influences – communist, socialist, Marxist, anarchist – and, within each of these currents of political thought, included splinter groups or factions, such as Leninist, Trotskyist, and Maoist factions within the communist strand. Again, these influences provided the basis for international solidarity. Importantly, many of these movements were also extraparliamentary. That is, they agitated outside of political institutions and parliamentary structures, seeking not votes but change on particular issues, again an opportunity to underscore transnational alliances. To be sure, the student and social movements of 1968 as well as the armed-struggle groups were a global phenomenon, acknowledged as such by everyone from participants to critics. As historian Martin Klimke puts it, “Whether we describe sixties’ protest as a revolution in the world-system, a global revolutionary movement or a conglomerate of national movements with local variants but common characteristics, its transnational dimension was one of its crucial motors” (8). While historical studies exist that compare student and social movements either within Europe or between Europe and the U. S., ones that compare the so-called “First World” of western capitalism with the “Third World” in Latin America, Africa, and Asia were – until recently – less common. Likewise, while a range of films and literary texts focus on the era – its student and social movements, as well as its armed-struggle groups – they seldom compare leftist movements transnationally. Early films of the New German Cinema with terrorism as a theme include Volker Schlöndorff and [End Page 64] Margarethe von Trotta’s Die verlorene Ehre der Katharina Blum (1975), Rainer Werner Fassbinder’s Mutter Küsters’ Fahrt zum Himmel (1975), von Trotta’s Das zweite Erwachen der Christa Klages (1977), the codirected Deutschland im Herbst (1978), Richard Hauff’s Messer im Kopf (1978), Fassbinder’s Die dritte Generation (1979), and von Trotta’s Die bleierne Zeit (1981). Yet none of them bring global solidarity into the discussion or compare terrorism in Germany and in another country. The spate of recent films produced about the left-wing terrorist group the Red Army Faction (RAF) also focus mostly on West Germany. These films include the documentaries Todesspiel (1997) by Heinrich Breloer, Andres Veiel’s Black Box BRD (2001), and Gerd Conradt’s Starbuck Holger Meins (2002), as well as the fictional feature films Die innere Sicherheit (2000) by Christian Petzold, Christoph Roth’s Baader (2002), Connie Walther’s Schattenwelt (2008), and Susanne Schneider’s Es kommt der Tag (2009). Two recent docudramas form notable exceptions to this trend. Uli Edel’s Oscar-nominated Der Baader Meinhof Komplex (2008) briefly mentions the RAF’s early training in Jordan at a Palestinian Liberation Organization camp; the hijacking of the Lufthansa airplane Landshut to Mogadishu, Somalia; and members of the RAF’s second generation waiting in Yemen, where they hoped to greet their comrades from the first generation. In exchange for the hostages of the hijacked plane, the plane’s hijackers, who were members of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, demanded the release of ten members of the RAF imprisoned at the Stammheim maximum security prison in Stuttgart, West Germany and two Palestinians imprisoned in Turkey. Yet Der Baader Meinhof Komplex engages the international relations among armed-struggle groups only in passing, at the film’s beginning and end. The failed...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.010
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0040.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminar A Journal of Germanic StudiesSame topicCommunism, Protests, Social MovementsFrench-language works237,207