Electronic Structure of Reduced Symmetry Peripheral Fused-Ring-Substituted Phthalocyanines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reduced symmetry phthalocyanines are finding use in an increasing number of industrial applications. A detailed understanding of the electronic structure of the pi-system will greatly facilitate the design of new complexes, which fit the specifications required in many of these emerging high technology fields. NMR, electronic absorption, magnetic circular dichroism (MCD), and fluorescence emission and excitation spectra have been recorded for five generic metal phthalocyanine (MPc) derivatives in which additional benzene rings are fused either radially or obliquely onto at least one of the four peripheral benzo groups. The spectroscopy of four radially substituted compounds, zinc mononaphthotribenzotetraazaporphyrine (Zn3B1N), zinc monobenzotrinaphthotetraazaporphyrine (Zn1B3N), and two cis and trans zinc dibenzodinaphthotetraazaporphyrine (Zn2B2N) isomers, is compared to that of the obliquely fused structural isomer of Zn3B1N (Zn3BoN) and the D(4)(h)() symmetry parent compounds, ZnPc and zinc naphthalocyanine (ZnNc). The selection of Zn(II) as the central metal eliminates the possibility of charge transfer between the metal and ring. None of the complexes studied contain any sigma-bonded peripheral substituents. (1)H NMR signals of the seven compounds are assigned on the basis of the coupling patterns, integrated proton numbers, and decoupling experiments. The SIMPFIT program was used to perform spectral band deconvolution analyses of absorption and MCD spectra. ZINDO molecular orbital calculations are described, and the optical spectra are assigned on the basis of the MO models that have been developed previously to account for the spectral properties of metal porphyrin (MP(-2)) and metal phthalocyanine (MPc(-2)) complexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".